Skip to content
Viewing: all (29)
  1. Barry Cumberlidge A contradiction costs more than a gap SEOContent strategyDigital strategyMarketing
  2. David Lowbridge The case for connected knowledge Brand automationContent strategyDigital strategy
  3. Barry Cumberlidge Nobody owns the topic yet SEOContent strategyDigital strategyMarketing
  4. Roger Whittlesea What does collaboration look like at the proposal stage? Digital strategyTechnical validationBrand automation
  5. Matthew Froggatt Internal work has no client Digital strategyMarketingContent strategy
  6. Barry Cumberlidge The gift of time Digital strategyBrand automationMarketing
  7. David Lowbridge From fixed values to behaviours Brand automationUX & UIDigital strategy
  8. Mike Leonard The web is fun Motion designUX & UITechnical validation
  9. Jara Santamaria Martinez Every year is a new brief PlatformsContent strategyTechnical validation
  10. Kristina Radonjic The work between the work Digital strategyMarketing
  11. Guanglun Wu Choosing the right tech stack Technical validationPlatformsDigital strategy
  12. Barry Cumberlidge Security deep dive Technical validationContent strategyDigital strategy
  13. David Lowbridge Startups are prototypes Digital strategyBrand automation
  14. Tara Heal Shapeshifting the Future UX & UIMarketing
  15. Tom Small The theme is the guardrail Brand automationPlatforms
  16. Barry Cumberlidge Your biggest asset in an RFP, your website SEOContent strategyDigital strategyMarketing
  17. Michael Gunner Cache Components: the right content at the right time PlatformsTechnical validationContent strategy
  18. David Lowbridge From static frames to a creative operating system Brand automationUX & UI
  19. Tom Small We build by leaving things out PlatformsDigital strategyUX & UI
  20. Michael Gunner Standardise the foundations, not the brand experience PlatformsBrand automation
  21. Charlie Clarke Letting type move Motion designUX & UI
  22. Andy Purbrick Putting video back where it belongs PlatformsTechnical validation
  23. Mike Leonard The cache that doubled as a coordinator PlatformsTechnical validation
  24. Andy Purbrick We test the revenue path Technical validationDigital strategy
  25. Mike Leonard Two months in Three.js, we started over Motion designTechnical validation
  26. Rhona Mackay The form we actually trust PlatformsTechnical validation
  27. Andy Purbrick The testbed nobody will see PlatformsTechnical validation
  28. Andy Purbrick Twenty-four modules, one wrapper PlatformsContent strategy
  29. Andy Purbrick We haven’t missed a Thursday in 33 weeks Content strategyMarketing

The case for connected knowledge

David Lowbridge 4 min read Brand automation Content strategy Digital strategy

Every proposal asks us to answer familiar questions: have we solved a problem like this before? Which technologies did we use? Who has the right expertise? What can we show that proves our credibility?

The case for connected knowledge

The answers to those questions usually exist somewhere: in project documents, decks, asset libraries or simply the memory of the team involved. But tracking those answers down, connecting the dots, and shaping them into a compelling argument can take almost as much effort as writing the proposal itself.

At Made by ON, we’re exploring how AI can unlock that accumulated intelligence, starting with something we already produce: case studies.

A case study is more than a project showcase

Image of a MadeByON case study

A case study is usually treated as a marketing deliverable: a polished account of a project written for an external audience. But underneath the marketing storyline sits a much richer record of organizational intelligence.

In principle, our case studies should function more like academic papers: rigorous records designed to document methodology, validate findings and allow future teams to build on past work. The difference is accessibility. Academic research often remains locked behind dense formats and specialized silos; our goal is to make that same depth of insight radically accessible across diverse audiences, formats and internal needs.

A case study holds the core problem we set out to solve, the decisions we made, the technologies we deployed, the expertise we brought to bear and the results we achieved. It reveals how we approach an industry, what worked in practice and why one architectural direction won out over another.

Conventional case studies are built to communicate an end result, not to help a colleague debug a technical challenge or pinpoint the right domain lead across hundreds of past engagements. AI gives us an opportunity to change this. Producing case studies more efficiently offers an immediate benefit by making our work visible with greater consistency and scale. But the real breakthrough comes when the intelligence underpinning them becomes structured, connected and actionable across an entire organization. The goal is not simply content reuse but to make our direct experience embedded in the work instantly available whenever someone needs it.

From project archive to knowledge graph

An interconnected organogram

Imagine preparing a pitch for a healthcare partner. Instead of digging through old decks and pinging colleagues on Slack, you could immediately surface relevant healthcare engagements, inspect the exact tech stack deployed and review how similar challenges were resolved. You could pinpoint peers with relevant domain experience and draw on validated precedents that strengthen your pitch on day one.

The same foundation helps a delivery team troubleshoot an architectural hurdle, an engineer evaluate past technical tradeoffs or a strategist map our related experience in an emerging sector. This is the role of a knowledge graph: connecting projects, people, technologies, industries and outcomes so relationships become actionable, not just searchable.

This is also what defines modern consultancy. Clients come to us for our expertise, but holding expertise in an archive is no longer enough. A modern consultancy gives its people the data infrastructure, connected skill sets and intelligent systems needed to deliver on that brand promise with speed and conviction every single time.

We started by making our project history queryable, with the case study simply the first artifact generated by the system. While a static library helps you locate a file, a connected knowledge system surfaces the reasoning, technical context and expertise behind it.

Knowing what to automate

Publishing checks ensure quality before launching

Making this work requires more than dumping documents into a model and asking questions. The underlying information must be structured cleanly, relationships must be well-defined and the system must distinguish between facts, rules and judgments.

That is why we combine deterministic processes with AI interpretation. We use AI when it helps interpret and connect unstructured information, not when a deterministic rule will do the job faster, cheaper and without drift.

Equally vital is preserving the boundaries of what the system actually knows. The system separates what a source states from what it infers, explicitly records what is missing instead of hallucinating to fill the gap and doesn’t make claims that still need approval. The goal is to make verified expertise available to the people who need it, exactly when they need it.

An asset that grows with every project

The most valuable AI investment is rarely the tool that outputs a single asset fastest. It is the infrastructure that makes an organization’s collective intelligence able to compound whilst being readily accessible.

Every project should leave behind more than the deliverable. It should feed into an asset that helps our organization understand its own capabilities, build on past lessons and put proven expertise directly into practice.

Ultimately, the question is not just how AI helps us produce more today, but how the work we produce today can make our organization more capable tomorrow.