Skip to content
Viewing: all (23)
  1. David Lowbridge From fixed values to behaviours Brand automationUX & UIDigital strategy
  2. Mike Leonard The web is fun Motion designUX & UITechnical validation
  3. Jara Santamaria Martinez Every year is a new brief PlatformsContent strategyTechnical validation
  4. Kristina Radonjic The work between the work Digital strategyMarketing
  5. Guanglun Wu Choosing the right tech stack Technical validationPlatformsDigital strategy
  6. Barry Cumberlidge Security deep dive Technical validationContent strategyDigital strategy
  7. David Lowbridge Startups are prototypes Digital strategyBrand automation
  8. Tara Heal Shapeshifting the Future UX & UIMarketing
  9. Tom Small The theme is the guardrail Brand automationPlatforms
  10. Barry Cumberlidge Your biggest asset in an RFP, your website SEOContent strategyDigital strategyMarketing
  11. Michael Gunner Cache Components: the right content at the right time PlatformsTechnical validationContent strategy
  12. David Lowbridge From static frames to a creative operating system Brand automationUX & UI
  13. Tom Small We build by leaving things out PlatformsDigital strategyUX & UI
  14. Michael Gunner Standardise the foundations, not the brand experience PlatformsBrand automation
  15. Charlie Clarke Letting type move Motion designUX & UI
  16. Andy Purbrick Putting video back where it belongs PlatformsTechnical validation
  17. Mike Leonard The cache that doubled as a coordinator PlatformsTechnical validation
  18. Andy Purbrick We test the revenue path Technical validationDigital strategy
  19. Mike Leonard Two months in Three.js, we started over Motion designTechnical validation
  20. Rhona Mackay The form we actually trust PlatformsTechnical validation
  21. Andy Purbrick The testbed nobody will see PlatformsTechnical validation
  22. Andy Purbrick Twenty-four modules, one wrapper PlatformsContent strategy
  23. Andy Purbrick We haven’t missed a Thursday in 33 weeks Content strategyMarketing

The work between the work

Kristina Radonjic 3 min read Digital strategy Marketing

Process can be standardised. Judgement cannot.

The work between the work

I’ve spent most of my career around client and project management, both in-house and agency-side, and lately I’ve been noticing how much of doing it well comes down to knowing when a process needs to change.

Timelines, budgets and resources still matter enormously. Increasingly, I see them as the structure that allows another kind of work to happen around them.

Producing the output isn’t the same as understanding it

The Industrial Revolution gave us more than factories. It gave us a way of thinking about work: break it into repeatable parts, standardise the process, then find ways to do it faster and at a greater scale. That logic travelled far beyond the production line into the workflows and methodologies we still use today.

I’ve watched the same logic play out in marketing. Campaigns were mapped across the year and launches planned months in advance. But the world around those plans now moves incredibly quickly. Customer behaviour shifts, opportunities emerge and what felt relevant when a plan was made may not be by the time it reaches the market. Staying relevant means being able to respond by reordering the work, adapting approvals or getting something live while the moment still matters.

AI and automation are accelerating workflows, whether that’s writing code, building spreadsheets or structuring marketing plans. Producing the output has never been easier. Knowing whether it’s right, what matters and what to do with it requires expertise and judgement now more than ever.

Structure gives us something to move around

Perhaps I’m naturally drawn to systems. Both of my parents are engineers, and much of my career has involved looking at how something works and wondering how it could work better.

Leading project management teams, I always aimed to make complex work structured and repeatable. At one point, we built a marketing operations system around media plans coming in from markets across the world. Standardising those inputs gave the production studio a clear way to understand what was required and produce the right outputs. At that scale, structure made the work possible. However, experience has taught me to recognise what the situation in front of me requires, rather than simply following the process.

Newspaper publishing, N.Y. Herald: Composing room and linotype machines, 1902.
The machines do the repeatable part, the person leaning in decides whether it’s right.

Here at Made by ON, we’ve come to think of the role less as just project management and more as holistic aspects of delivery. The emphasis shifts from managing a process to taking responsibility for what we are ultimately there to deliver.

That requires judgement and an understanding of people. Every client and team has its own culture, pressures and ways of working. Good Delivery means understanding those differences and shaping the process around how the people and teams involved actually work best.

The relationship changes the work

That may also be why Delivery is appearing earlier. It increasingly starts before everything has been defined, helps shape the route and stays close as it evolves.

Getting that right means getting closer to the people and the business: understanding what matters, recognising when to challenge or listen, and building enough trust to change direction when needed.

Pressmen watching pages run through the presses at The New York Times, 1942
The presses run themselves, the pressmen watch, check and judge

I used to think I was helping to deliver projects. Increasingly, I think doing that well also means helping to deliver the relationships around them.

And if making our processes more efficient gives us anything back, it should be time. Time for the work that only people can do. The work between the work.